rabbit anti pd l1 antibody (Bioss)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Pd L1 Antibody, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti pd l1 antibody/product/Bioss
Average 94 stars, based on 8 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Metformin glycyrrhetinic acid binary injectable hydrogel for synergistic tumor immunotherapy via spatiotemporal microenvironment remodeling"
Article Title: Metformin glycyrrhetinic acid binary injectable hydrogel for synergistic tumor immunotherapy via spatiotemporal microenvironment remodeling
Journal: Materials Today Bio
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102749
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment (TME) by Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A, B ) Immunofluorescence analysis and quantitative analysis of HMGB1 exposure (A, red) and CRT exposure (B, red) in B16-F10 cells following different treatments. Blue: DAPI (n = 3). ( C ) Immunofluorescence staining of CD86,iNOS and CD206 in macrophages (n = 3). ( D ) Immunofluorescence staining of PD-L1 (n = 3). ( E-G )Quantitative analysis of CD86,iNOS and CD206 expression. ( H ) Quantitative analysis of PD-L1 expression (n = 3). Data are presented as Mean ± SD. Pairwise comparisons against the control group were performed using Student's t-test; differences among multiple groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Ns: not significant (P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus Ctrl. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 versus the IL-4 group. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo immune activation of Fe 3 O 4 NPs@Met-GA-H. ( A, B ) Immunofluorescence staining of HMGB1 (A, red) and CRT (B, red) in tumor tissues following various treatments. Blue: DAPI; scale bars: 100 μm. (n = 5). ( C, D ) Immunofluorescent staining of CD206 (C, green) and CD86 (D, green) in tumor sections. Blue: DAPI; scale bars: 100 μm. (n = 5). ( E ) Immunofluorescence staining of PD-L1 expression (red) in tumors across treatment groups. Blue: DAPI; scale bars: 100 μm. (n = 5). ( F, G ) Flow cytometry analysis of MHC-II expression (F) and CD80 + +CD86 + populations (G) in DCs from spleens. (n = 5). ( H ) Immunofluorescence co-staining of CD4 (green) and CD8 (red) in tumor tissues. Blue: DAPI; scale bars: 100 μm. (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA. Ns: not significant ( P > 0.05); ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01, ∗∗∗ P < 0.001 versus the Ctrl. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Activation Assay, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Expressing, Flow Cytometry
